No replies to this topic

[DanyaR]

Hello everyone! I'd just like to quickly post a format that helps me when I'm writing my historical investigation. I've always thought of Section D being the juiciest part of the paper, so it should be set up for one's benefit. My History Teacher taught me  the KEATEAL format. For every point made, there has to be some sort of evidence and analysis to back it up.

With that said, this is how your section D ( if you chose to follow this format) would look like:

THESIS

Keypoint 1
Evidence
Analysis
Transition
Evidence
Analysis
Link


K 2
E
A
T
E
A
L


K 3
E
A
T
E
A
L

Conclusion

It may seem strange to have a conclusion within an analysis, but it helps wrap up your analysis neatly which could be the difference between getting partial and full points. Of course, the conclusion does not have to be like the conclusion at end of the Historical Investigation. It could just be "Because of this, (position in which you stand) "

Need an example? Please feel free to ask, and I will upload one.

Can't see the attachment clearly? Let me know, and I'll clarify:]

Attached Files

•  SCAN0009.JPG   1.28MB   6 downloads

Edited by DanyaR, Jan 15, 2012 - 17:58.