Jump to content

"The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility." Evaluate this claim.


davis0621

Recommended Posts

I'm working on the TOK title paper, and I wanted to see what others think of this title.

Title #3: "The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility." Evaluate this claim.

No one in my class is doing this title and I need some help. I want to affirm the claim, and say that knowing something carries a responsibility to act to either prevent harm, uphold principles of integrity (in a case of lying or cheating), and/or to spread wellness.

I have a definition in mind for ethical responsibility, but not for "Possession of knowledge" yet.

I want to take this in the direction of Ethics and Human Sciences. With a focus in emotion and reason.

Any help?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

No one in my class is doing this title and I need some help. I want to affirm the claim, and say that knowing something carries a responsibility to act to either prevent harm, uphold principles of integrity (in a case of lying or cheating), and/or to spread wellness.

I have a definition in mind for ethical responsibility, but not for "Possession of knowledge" yet.

Why can't you just take the 'possession of knowledge' as knowing something?

Anyone with any pointers on this? Our classtime with TOK has been rather meek, and everything is appreciated.

Can't you think of anything for this question? You have to at least contribute a little bit to get some help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is 'deep' enough, but can you say that the possession of knowledge is having some information that can be used? The facebook TOK page that Jonathan recommended suggested distinguishing between knowing something and actually using that knowledge. It said that ethical responsibility comes from how you use your knowledge and not just having the knowledge.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting thought might be how we interpret responsibility. Does responsibility always mean a logical reasoned response/reaction to whatever it is we now know about that raises an ethical issue? Or can you be ethically responsible for something in an emotional way only?

An example might be the famous "You see a train hurtling at unstoppable speed down a railway. However, on the main track, right in the path of the train, you can also see three people who are all completely oblivious to the train coming. Even if you shouted and did your best, you'd never be able to warn them to get them out the way in time. You also see that on a siding to the railway, there's only one person standing there. As it happens, you're standing right next to the lever which diverts the train from one side of the track to the other. At the moment, it's heading for the 3 people, but you might just have time to change it so that instead it goes down the side towards 1 person. What do you do?"

In this case it might be interesting to think about what you'd be responsible for. Are you ethically responsible just because you know about the situation? Would you be responsible if you moved the lever? Would you be responsible for the death of the 3 people if you didn't move the lever?

It's interesting because it raises the issue of whether you would be responsible not only for your actions but also your inactions. And how does responsibility manifest? Looking at guilt and emotional feelings of responsibility would certainly be a thought-provoking area. I would say I often feel responsible for things not entirely in my power - and through an emotional guilt simply that I knew about it or was an observer rather than a logical feeling that I could have done something. It might be interesting in the essay to examine this distinction and thereby look at Ways of Knowing as well as the title question.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was wondering the same thing. With this topic is it better to stick to real world examples rather than the hypothetical? Because I have some ideas for hypothetical examples where I can include the different WoK and AoK but if it should all real world thing that have happened I'm afraid I only have a one sided arguement so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing. With this topic is it better to stick to real world examples rather than the hypothetical? Because I have some ideas for hypothetical examples where I can include the different WoK and AoK but if it should all real world thing that have happened I'm afraid I only have a one sided arguement so far.

I believe it's not recommended to use hypothetical situations. But it's possible, as long as it enhances your explanation of your KI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey I have chosen this title and have made a first draft. However i am not very happy with it and would now like to change my dealing with the AoKs. I was thinking about choosing the arts and the human/nat. sciences with examples that a piece of art does not carry an ethical responsibility alone but may get it in connection to its context. i.e.: that a photo of a starving child may carry an ethical responsibility. for the sciences I was thinking about doctors and maybe even Einsten

I'd be greatful for help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm working on the exact same thing. The great internet advised me to challenge the claim at first, and also to look at assumptions. This title assumes that ALL KINDS of knowledge will carry an ethical responsibility. I will try to look onto the differences between practical and theoretical knowledge. For instance if you know how to cook a meal, is it your responsibility to rid the world of starvation? That's practical knowledge. On the other hand, if this recipe DOES make it possible to rid the world of starvation, we can start talking about ethical responsibility. The recipe might be something you've made yourself and that you want to keep a secret, but if you share it it might save lives.

It's probably not a great example, but you probably catch my drift here.

Do you guys think I'm totally wrong here, or does anyone agree? :panic:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well to be honest, I've been told to not use hypothetical examples despite supporting my arguments so real life examples are absolute and I'm dealing with Natural vs Human Science here. And i don't think there is any right or wrong answers here it's just a matter of whether your arguments are valid enough to be backed up by your examples and if it follows the bloody criteria >.<

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey.

I'm writing on the same title, I already started writing and right now have around 1000 words. I just need a liitle help or guidance. Throghout my essay i disscussed about Ethics and how flexible it is I also talked about natural sciences, religion and emotions. I heard giving experiences is important but for some reason I feel my essay is weak.

Can someone please provide some advice??

Thanks. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

An interesting thought might be how we interpret responsibility. Does responsibility always mean a logical reasoned response/reaction to whatever it is we now know about that raises an ethical issue? Or can you be ethically responsible for something in an emotional way only?

An example might be the famous "You see a train hurtling at unstoppable speed down a railway. However, on the main track, right in the path of the train, you can also see three people who are all completely oblivious to the train coming. Even if you shouted and did your best, you'd never be able to warn them to get them out the way in time. You also see that on a siding to the railway, there's only one person standing there. As it happens, you're standing right next to the lever which diverts the train from one side of the track to the other. At the moment, it's heading for the 3 people, but you might just have time to change it so that instead it goes down the side towards 1 person. What do you do?"

In this case it might be interesting to think about what you'd be responsible for. Are you ethically responsible just because you know about the situation? Would you be responsible if you moved the lever? Would you be responsible for the death of the 3 people if you didn't move the lever?

It's interesting because it raises the issue of whether you would be responsible not only for your actions but also your inactions. And how does responsibility manifest? Looking at guilt and emotional feelings of responsibility would certainly be a thought-provoking area. I would say I often feel responsible for things not entirely in my power - and through an emotional guilt simply that I knew about it or was an observer rather than a logical feeling that I could have done something. It might be interesting in the essay to examine this distinction and thereby look at Ways of Knowing as well as the title question.

perfect example (Y) i have to write a mock essay on this topic and thanks to your example i just found out that my understanding of the title was incomplete.. cheers man..

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was my topic! For assessment my teacher gave me an A, that being said my final mark was a B -_-

I like to start TOK essays with a quote and this time I actually did it with two. The first being attributed to Sir Francis Bacon "Knowledge is Power" and then a quote from the gospel of Luke I think... I can't remember it exactly, but it essentially said that one who wields power of others must wield it righteously. So my essay centered on knowledge having an ethical responsibility because with it, you were given power to do things over others, supersede others or changers others lives.

I would seriously suggest looking at Plato's allegory of the cave if you haven't already in TOK class, its all about knowledge and ethical decisions, its analysis will deepen your essay immensely.

Feel free to message me if you want some suggestions, etc

Edited by Luka Petrovic
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...