sophmliib Posted June 1, 2014 Report Share Posted June 1, 2014 (edited) Hi, I'm currently working on my macroeconomics IA. The draft is due in two weeks and I'm struggling with the evaluation section because the structure of the article I'm doing now is quite different from what I did for microeconomics. So my article is about imposing a higher minimum wage in Switzerland and for my graphs I have explained the impact of a minimum wage. I'm just left with the evaluating part and I'm confused about what to evaluate on. In my last IA, I devised a solution of my own and then evaluated that solution/"policy". But in this IA, am I allowed to evaluate the imposing of minimum wage itself, or should I think of a solution that will counteract the effects of a minimum wage (for instance, high unemployment, inflation..etc) Or can I do either of them? I personally prefer to evaluate the imposing of minimum wage, because it's a topic I feel pretty confident with I'm just worried that it's not what I'm supposed to do in my IA. Thanks in advance! Edited June 1, 2014 by sophmliib Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossih Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 You should do both. The word count is tight but you need 2 well developed points of evaluation. For one you could use the effectiveness of the policy, and for the other you can suggest (in depth) other policies 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophmliib Posted June 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Thank you for the great advice Ossih! I think I'll try doing both Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.