JAYT, on Dec 4 2008, 02:37 AM, said:
Well, Mr. Shiver I said 'detailed' which doesn't mean 'Vague, open-ended language and modern day knowledge together can easily put more significance to text than it deserves'.
My whole point was that they're
not detailed. I'm not sure why you're taking this personally.
Quote
It actually has an accurate description of the womb, for example the approxiamate size and shape of the fetus at specific periods.
As I've said already, I don't think you need to have any modern scientific background to notice that something happens inside a woman's womb when semen enters the vagina, and that whatever lives in there gets bigger and bigger.
Now, let's take a look at the verses you're talking about, 39:6 and 3:12-16. First of all, "three veils of darkness" means nothing in relation to modern science, and sounds more like a poetic description of something unknown and mysterious which merely draws attention to the mystery of it. My feeling is that there's no reason not to consider the possibility that by that point in time a few people had used some common sense to decide that the living thing is probably "hanging" from somewhere inside the womb, or else it would fall out. As it grows, it must reach and surpass a point at which it becomes "bite-size". Then they would have looked at their own bodies and noticed that their bones are underneath their flesh, and figured that if the living thing is growing, the "bones" probably come first and then the "flesh". Because, they probably postulated, things grow from the inside out, not the outside in. I'm still not quite sure why you need advanced knowledge of embryology to map out this process.
Quote
It has descriptions of the mountains structure in the earth's crust
"When you look at the mountains, you think they are standing still. But they are moving, like the clouds."
There is nothing in this verse to suggest that it contains any miraculous geological knowledge. It seems more like another fanciful poetic statement to me, where an apparently inanimate object is personified to capture the imagination of the reader. It's scientific accuracy could easily just be mere coincidence.
"And the mountains as pegs."
Well yeah, to a 7th century Arab, a large mountain in a comparatively enormous and unknown world could easily be characterized as a peg, especially since mountains often happen to be pointy at the top. Again, this verse doesn't suggest any knowledge of tectonic plates and continental drift. It does, however, tie in well with the Islamic principle of humility.
Quote
and states clearly that the water of the the different oceans (pacific and atlantic) do not mix
I'm sure that by the time that verse appeared, the Arabs had realized from their Yemeni neighbours that sea water doesn't taste so good. In fact, it happens to taste kinda...salty. "Yuck! But that other fresh water tastes so much sweeter. Hmmm, how could this water taste so sweet and other water taste so salty? Maybe there's a barrier in between so that the good water and bad water don't mix!"
The Arabs weren't idiots. Their intellectual prowess in subsequent centuries can attest to this. It's entirely possible that the Qur'an's constant encouragement to better understand the world around them contributed a lot to their success. But it didn't come from nowhere. Even in times of great ignorance, communal knowledge is still preserved through generations of oral tradition and scripture, because we human beings have a certain curiosity about us which never really goes away.
And don't even try to throw that cosmological mysticism at me. It means absolutely nothing in relation to studies in astrophysics.
Quote
I suggest you do a little more reading and research instead of telling me that i'm arrogant.
It's not you I was calling arrogant. What I was calling arrogant is the entire idea that 1400 years ago people weren't able to think for themselves, and that's the assumption that has to be made in order to consider a few verses from an allegedly divine text to be "scientific miracles".
Quote
You can go ahead and believe that God exists (I'm pretty sure I still do too, albeit with many reservations), but this is not the evidence that would support that notion. And again, I say this having myself been born and raised a Muslim.
One last bit of advice for you: avoid calling people you've never met before ignorant, because that itself is an ignorant thing to do. Oh, and biased sources with confirmation bias from a few "expert opinions" does not justify anything.
Edited by Mr. Shiver, Dec 05, 2008 - 01:26.