LittleDeer Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 (edited) Hello, could you help me with my RQ? I decided to write about ritual slaughter (halal and kosher) in Poland, most likely. My RQ is now "Should the ritual slaughter be banned in Poland?" I know the question isn't very well formulated. Perhaps it would sound better with "To what extent.." rather than "should"? Or do you have any other ideas?Also, do you think it's narrow enough? I suppose it would be better to add some more details, right? Like, "religious freedom before or after animal rights?" Do you have ANY advices? Any feedback is appreciated. Edited February 10, 2016 by LittleDeer Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosalina Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 Alright, first of all you may want to find something other than "ritual slaughter." It implies barbarism and Halal and Kosher are very important Muslims and Jewish people,respectively. Maybe don't even use religion at all as you never know who's marking. If you must, the question can be re-formatted to something like "Using the example of Halal and Kosher food, to what extent should religious freedom prevail over animal rights?" Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kartikeya Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 This is not exactly politics. This comes under human rights which is also offered at EE Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleDeer Posted February 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Alright, first of all you may want to find something other than "ritual slaughter." It implies barbarism and Halal and Kosher are very important Muslims and Jewish people,respectively. Maybe don't even use religion at all as you never know who's marking. If you must, the question can be re-formatted to something like "Using the example of Halal and Kosher food, to what extent should religious freedom prevail over animal rights?" Oh you're right, I may offend some examinator :xxBut religion plays quite important role in politics in many countries, in Poland too, do your think I shouldn't write about it?Thanks for the idea for RQ, it sounds nice This is not exactly politics. This comes under human rights which is also offered at EE You think so? Well, as I think of it now, you're probably right :/ But I've read the guide of human rights EE and it says the area of topis is very narrow and I don't take human rights, so I don't know if it'll be combatible with the syllabus Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kartikeya Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Alright, first of all you may want to find something other than "ritual slaughter." It implies barbarism and Halal and Kosher are very important Muslims and Jewish people,respectively. Maybe don't even use religion at all as you never know who's marking. If you must, the question can be re-formatted to something like "Using the example of Halal and Kosher food, to what extent should religious freedom prevail over animal rights?" Oh you're right, I may offend some examinator :xxBut religion plays quite important role in politics in many countries, in Poland too, do your think I shouldn't write about it?Thanks for the idea for RQ, it sounds nice This is not exactly politics. This comes under human rights which is also offered at EE You think so? Well, as I think of it now, you're probably right :/ But I've read the guide of human rights EE and it says the area of topis is very narrow and I don't take human rights, so I don't know if it'll be combatible with the syllabus In our school also there is no human rights but our teacher has given us the syllabus for human rights Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleDeer Posted February 11, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 Alright, first of all you may want to find something other than "ritual slaughter." It implies barbarism and Halal and Kosher are very important Muslims and Jewish people,respectively. Maybe don't even use religion at all as you never know who's marking. If you must, the question can be re-formatted to something like "Using the example of Halal and Kosher food, to what extent should religious freedom prevail over animal rights?" Oh you're right, I may offend some examinator :xxBut religion plays quite important role in politics in many countries, in Poland too, do your think I shouldn't write about it?Thanks for the idea for RQ, it sounds nice In our school also there is no human rights but our teacher has given us the syllabus for human rightsThis is not exactly politics. This comes under human rights which is also offered at EE You think so? Well, as I think of it now, you're probably right :/ But I've read the guide of human rights EE and it says the area of topis is very narrow and I don't take human rights, so I don't know if it'll be combatible with the syllabus @kartikeya Really? :0 Was there anything about halal or kosher? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosalina Posted February 11, 2016 Report Share Posted February 11, 2016 I agree that religion plays a great role in politics, the problem is that when it comes to religion, many people get emotional about it. It's very easy to offend someone even when its not your intention. There are other aspects of politics that aren't controversial that you could write about. Out of curiosity, what will you be your argument for your EE? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.