marcelgs Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 I've completed an IA in physics that is part simulation and part hands-on exploration. In the simulation part, I establish an exponential relationship using a simulation (that I made) which simulates individual particles and some calculus. I was wondering if this is perhaps too mathematics focused and risks straying outside the bounds of the task. I end up concluding that there is an exponential relationship, which is then confirmed using theory (from Option C), then I fit my experimental data to the model to obtain some parameters. 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBTopper Posted November 23, 2016 Report Share Posted November 23, 2016 Hi Marcelgs, I think it should be completely fine, as mathematics is 'the language' of physics and as long as you are explain and highlight the physics theory (from option C in your case) it should be fine. Quick Tip: I know you may be knowing this, but try to use more of physics terminology and notation instead of maths. This will help you in the communication criterion. Hope this helps Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.