Shay Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 Can I used the lab instruction sheet provided by my teacher for the background information, outline, variables, ect. or would that be considered plagiarism? I wouldn't want to get kicked out of the school for just trying to do a good first IA.Yes you can! but it depends if the lab report is graded on the design criteria. then you can't.. ... also if you do use the instruction sheet write that you used it as a source and stuff... Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBbio_1 Posted February 7, 2014 Report Share Posted February 7, 2014 Any suggestions as to how you graph/plot/analyze data so that it meet the "qualitive data" criteria? What types of questions might be useful if conducting an IA on catalase and the affect temperature has on it? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cryphisss Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Thank you sooooooooo much for this amazing post! Helped me a ton! Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuliaCivetta Posted April 14, 2014 Report Share Posted April 14, 2014 I need help! I have to submit my IA untill tomorrow. Could you tell me if I include the control group in calculations in data processing? My topic is: "The influence of different pH on the catalase reaction in a pork liver"I have 4 pH + control group neutral pH and I measure the height of foam 3 times on each test tube (at 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes after pouring with H202). Do I include the control group in my calculations, namely: Mean height and standard deviation for each time (1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes) for each group will be calculatedwhere N <that is the quotient> is equal 21 (as experiment will be repeated once on a control group and 5 times on 4 different pH buffers)or maybe it should be is equal 20 (as an experiment will be repeated 5 times).My teacher told me not to repeat the control group.HELP PLEASE. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElvenRanger Posted April 19, 2014 Report Share Posted April 19, 2014 I always show an example of percent error in my sample calculations just to be safe. Better safe than sorry when it comes to IB.My teacher says you don't *have* to calculate percent error but it helps to have a measure of just how accurate your data is when you're going over limitations in the CE portion of the lab.You definitely need to have uncertainties in your data tables and in the form of error bars on your graph(s). It's mentioned in at least one of the criterion for DCP. I have a question as well-how many limitations/improvements are needed to score a 2 in those areas for CE? Because most of my teachers say they want 5, which I think is a bit ridiculous when I always find myself grasping at straws for the last 1-2; I tend to focus more on providing three extremely relevant limitations with several sentences of explanation each. Is that ok? Because it's getting really irritating, being marked down every single lab for that. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edu Munoz Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 Okay, so I found a bunch of notes I took when my teachers were giving us IA tips and format..etc. Some of the below I had to copy of the board, so you may find these in the books. So, Biology IAs should follow this general format: DESIGN 1)Research Question 2)Hypothesis/Predictions 3)Variables 4)Apparatus 5)Method/procedure DCP 1)Collected data 2)Data processing 3)Data presentation CE 1)Conclusion 2)Evaluation Design Research question: This should be a clear focused question that says exactly what you are investigating. It shouldn't be too long and it must include the dependent and independent variables. Eg. What is the effect of pH on the activity rate of salivary amylase? Dependent variable: activity rate Independent variable: pH Hypothesis: This is a paragraph or two where you explain your research question. You are going to say something like: "Salivary Amylase is a an enzyme that digests starch into di- and monosaccharides. Since it's a salivary amylase, the enzyme works best at an alkaline pH of 7, in other words, the optimum pH is 7. At this pH, the rate of amylase activity will be at it's highest. A pH that is much lower (very acidic) or much higher (very alkaline) will denature the enzyme permanently (specifically the active site), and the enzyme can't function anymore. The activity of the enzyme will decrease as we increase or decrease pH." You may also want to include a graph to show this if this possible. Variables: A list or a table that include: -Independent variable: this is the variable you're changing. In the example above, the pH. -Dependent variable: this is what changes when you change the independent variable. Eg. Activity rate. -Controlled variables: these are all the other variables that must be kept the same in order to get an accurate results. For example, Temperature, pressure..etc. Apparatus: This is the list where you include everything you are going to use. Make sure you don't forget anything. My teacher always told me to include a diagram of the apparatus, so you may want to add that too. When listing the apparatus, be specific: 1)'A beaker' wont work, you have to specify the type and the volume. Same for any other apparatus of this sort. 2)When listing chemical substances like enzymes or starch solutions. Include the volume and the concentration. 3)For Solid substances used, include the mass in 'g' 4)When mentioning the thermometer, you may want to say it goes from -2C to 100C just to be specific. Method: I always prefer the method being in a list format rather than a paragraph. It makes it much easier to read and understand. I would advise you to not use the first person. For example if you want to say "I will measure 50ml of starch solution into a beaker" you should say "Measure 50ml of starch solution into a beaker" Please make sure you include every single step, don't miss one because it seems like an 'obvious' step! Also make sure that your method controls the controlled variables and allows the collection of raw data. After finishing your design, take a look at the table below (from the syllabus) to make sure you didn't miss anything: Data Collection and Processing (DCP) Collected data: This is normally given in one or more tables. Make sure your table is clear and easy to read and follow. Trust me, it makes a difference. Do not forget to include the units at the top of each column in brackets and the error! Here's an example: Data processing: Data processing is where they want you to do something with the data. Find an average, do one of the hypothesis test, calculate the standard deviation...etc. It normally depends on the experiment. Errors/uncertainties: This is the calculation of the % error in your experiment which you're going to discuss in CE. The uncertainty of each apparatus should be printed on it. If it's not, then the uncertainty is the half the smallest division. For example, a ruler that with 0.1cm division will have an error of +/- 0.05cm. Data presentation: This presentation should be of the raw data and the processed data if possible. Bar graphs and line graphs are one of the best way to present a data in most cases. A pie chart or a scatter graph may also be used. When adding the graph, make sure it has a title, labelled axis and legends. If you are for example investigating something at two different environments or situations, you should have a graph for each and then a third graph with the both, to show better comparison. In most cases, you are going to have to do at least 3 or 4 trials, include the graphs for each, then a final one of the average results. When appropriate include the uncertainties in the graph. Please make sure the graph/chart is suitable for your type of data before using it. Here are examples: Bar Graph: Pie Chart: Once again, take a look at the criteria for a last check: Conclusion and Evaluation (CE) Conclusion: The first point about the conclusion is that it should directly relate to the hypothesis. In other words, your conclusion must restate and discuss the hypothesis. You are not going to say why the results weren't accurate in this section. You're going to do discuss your results. Does it support the hypothesis? Were you predictions correct? Make sure you mention them again. I read this in one of the documents it got, and many people make this mistake: when talking about a hypothesis you're talking about whether the results support or refute the hypothesis, not prove the hypothesis. In your conclusion, make sure you discuss the graphs, the charts..the data processing..etc. Evaluation and improvement methods I would organize this part in this way: 1st paragraph: the weaknesses and limitations. In other words, all the possible reasons you could think of as to why your % error is too big (if that applies), why you results didn't perfectly support the hypothesis, why you results weren't accurate...etc. So basically, you're going to talk about all the weaknesses in your design and the effects these weaknesses had on the results. When mentioning the possible errors, I suggest doing it in bullet points because like I said they're much easier to read and understand. 2nd paragraph: improvements: This is basically the "The errors above could be avoided next time by.....". Then just start suggesting all the things you would do differently next time to get better results, for example: 1)Repeat the experiments more than x times. 2)Control temperature and pressure more carefully. 3)Try to reduce human errors. 4)Use more accurate apparatus for volume measurements. and so on. Criteria table: EDIT: Criteria tables added. What a great post! Like it Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edu Munoz Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 I always show an example of percent error in my sample calculations just to be safe. Better safe than sorry when it comes to IB.My teacher says you don't *have* to calculate percent error but it helps to have a measure of just how accurate your data is when you're going over limitations in the CE portion of the lab.You definitely need to have uncertainties in your data tables and in the form of error bars on your graph(s). It's mentioned in at least one of the criterion for DCP.I have a question as well-how many limitations/improvements are needed to score a 2 in those areas for CE? Because most of my teachers say they want 5, which I think is a bit ridiculous when I always find myself grasping at straws for the last 1-2; I tend to focus more on providing three extremely relevant limitations with several sentences of explanation each. Is that ok? Because it's getting really irritating, being marked down every single lab for that.Of course my teacher also qualified it! good tip Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patryk Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 Hello! I'm writing my report on the influence of colour of light on the growth of Garden cress (Lepidium sativum). I'm investigating gour colours: red, blue, yellow and green. I plan to carry out the t=test and was wondering which sets should be analysed... Do you think it's a good idea to commpare them like this: blue&red, blue&green, blue&yellow, red&yellow, red&green, green&yellow?? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwilkendorf Posted May 8, 2015 Report Share Posted May 8, 2015 WAAAHHHH THANK YOU SO MUCH Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
batool Posted December 5, 2015 Report Share Posted December 5, 2015 This has been really, really useful! Thank you Does anyone have any idea how big images should be on each page or how many we could fit? I would hate to lose presentation marks by having a silly mistake like making the image too small and the 12 page limit makes that really tough!! Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nada Ash Posted December 17, 2015 Report Share Posted December 17, 2015 where is the informational background section? I mean my teacher told me it must be there + as I know the hypothesis means what you expect to happen before you do the experiment with explanation of why you think so Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amina Tabakovic Posted January 2, 2016 Report Share Posted January 2, 2016 Hi, could I use this format when writing an IA based on a data simulation? And does anyone have experience with writing IAs that are not a typical hands-on laboratory experiment? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.