maereth Posted December 11, 2012 Report Share Posted December 11, 2012 Hi, I wanted to include a physics example in my TOK essay, but since I don't take physics, I decided to ask for a little help.I want to write abt Abraham-Minkowski controversy. Obviously, I've done some research and I know what it is about. But I can't find any information what it applies to in general. I mean, if it was definitely resolved (some are arguing that it actually already is) what would the results mean? And what new does the "more correct" equation bring to physics? Maybe they both do but in different ways?I just need a simple explanation, if anybody has any idea about that I would really appreciate your help. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackersS Posted December 22, 2012 Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 Well……this is a bit of confusing, thus I advise you to change an example to support your argument. At least this is what my TOK teacher told me, 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maereth Posted December 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 ohh, too bad... I've already changed it twice and I'm not really creative so it would be hard to change it. Plus I have to send the final version this weekend... So if I wrote just what it is about in general and that its resolved but also we've got some grounds for new research as well, would that be okay? ok, maybe that's not exactly what I wrote, it's hard to summarise it now... OK, anyway, thanks for the answer. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.