rubentexas Posted June 9, 2014 Report Share Posted June 9, 2014 So I'm doing my critical response (WT2) on a fox news article about an amendment to the U.S. constitution which would grants Congress and the states the power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal and state elections, respectively. My prescribed question is:'' How and why could this text be interpreted differently by two different readers?'' So I chose to write one paragraph on how it could be interpreted by republicans and one on how it could be interpreted by democrats. My problem now is that I'm unsure what to write the other paragraph about. I thought I might just write about the amendment in general, but I have no clue whether this would be allowed or whether I could apply the P.I.E. structure to this. So does anyone know whether writing about this would be ok? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrowhead Posted June 15, 2014 Report Share Posted June 15, 2014 This is a question that is best posed to your English teacher for his/her opinion. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.