m.k.2015 Posted December 30, 2014 Report Share Posted December 30, 2014 Hello everyone, I have been trying to study the gravitational potential energy concept from two sources. One of which described the change in gravitational potenial energy to be:m*(V2 - V1)= m*change in Vwhile the other described it as m*(V1 - V2)= - m*change in Vso which one is it?and can the change in gravitational potential energy be negative?Thanks in advance Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vioh Posted December 30, 2014 Report Share Posted December 30, 2014 Hello everyone, I have been trying to study the gravitational potential energy concept from two sources. One of which described the change in gravitational potenial energy to be: m*(V2 - V1) = m*change in V while the other described it as m*(V1 - V2) = - m*change in V so which one is it? and can the change in gravitational potential energy be negative? Thanks in advance Both sources are correct. They're just different representations of the same thing. However, the more important thing is that the equations that you quoted have nothing whatsoever to do with whether gravitational potential energy being positive or negative. Don't get confused by the negative sign in the equation. In physics, we always define change in gravitation potential energy in this way: So, ΔEpcan happen to be negative if V1 > V2. When you deal with question relating to motion of a particle in a gravitation field, V2 is always defined as the final position of the particle. It's just like the formula Q = mcΔT, in which ΔT can be a negative value as long as the final temperature is lower than the initial temperature. Hence, always use the formula that I gave above, especially if you don't want to get confused whenever you deal with motion of particles in a field. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m.k.2015 Posted December 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2014 So I always work out the change and take the absolute value of it? That's what I used to do in Q=mc ΔT Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vioh Posted December 30, 2014 Report Share Posted December 30, 2014 So I always work out the change and take the absolute value of it? That's what I used to do in Q=mc ΔT *Change* is not defined as a positive value! So you don't need to take the absolute value of anything. Similarly, you don't take the absolute value of mcΔT because the sign can actually give you tonnes of information. If mcΔT is negative, then you know that the system loses heat. On the other hand, if mcΔT is positive, the system gains heat. So don't take the absolute value. Leave it as it is 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m.k.2015 Posted December 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2014 Alright I get it now .. The later minus the first no matter what the sign is .. Thank you Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.