Kv19971 Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Btw. There was a question on green light being emitted from two point sources, which had just NOT been resolved. So the options asked how to resolve it and there were two contrasting ones: red light and using a circular aperture. Both would increase the angle theta so what'd you write? (I should be revising for Chem and CS right now )The answer to that question was using the red light. Red light has a minimum wavelength of 620nm. Blue light has a minimum wavelength of 550nm. Since 1.22*550 < 620, the answer should have been red light since it increases the value of theta more than using a circular aperture would. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamind Posted May 14, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Btw. There was a question on green light being emitted from two point sources, which had just NOT been resolved. So the options asked how to resolve it and there were two contrasting ones: red light and using a circular aperture. Both would increase the angle theta so what'd you write? (I should be revising for Chem and CS right now )The answer to that question was using the red light. Red light has a minimum wavelength of 620nm. Blue light has a minimum wavelength of 550nm. Since 1.22*550 < 620, the answer should have been red light since it increases the value of theta more than using a circular aperture would. I know right I ticked red light too, but some people are saying it should be violet light. But aren't we supposed to increase the value of theta, thereby using red light? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan76 Posted May 14, 2015 Report Share Posted May 14, 2015 Theta is the required angle to be resolved, like a price, so you want to reduce the price not to increase it right ? So you want theta to be smaller so that there is less diffraction 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuki Kuran Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) Paper one was a disaster, but paper 2 was easy;) In paper 1, I think there was a question, where two answers were correct just like the aperture/green light one. It said that a particle with mass m, charge q had radius r in a unuform magnetic field. If another particle entered and had the same radius r, what could be its mass, charge and velocity. I have solved itmv^2/r=qvBmv/r=qBmv/q=BrI think that it had options 2m, 2q, v and 2m, q, v/2 Edited May 15, 2015 by Yuki Kuran Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mechnight Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 Paper one was a disaster, but paper 2 was easy;)In paper 1, I think there was a question, were two answers were coorect just like the aperture/green light one.It said that a particle with mass m, charge q had radius r in a unuform magnetic field. If another particle entered and had the same radius r, what could be its mass, charge and velocity.I have solved itmv^2/r=qvBmv/r=qBmv/q=BrI think that it had options 2m, 2q, v and 2m, q, v/2 Yep, I think I had it like you as well. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan76 Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) Paper one was a disaster, but paper 2 was easy;) In paper 1, I think there was a question, were two answers where correct just like the aperture/green light one. It said that a particle with mass m, charge q had radius r in a unuform magnetic field. If another particle entered and had the same radius r, what could be its mass, charge and velocity. I have solved itmv^2/r=qvBmv/r=qBmv/q=BrI think that it had options 2m, 2q, v and 2m, q, v/2No,there is one answer,for this reason mcq is tricky, however after recieving feedback they may accept 2 answers or discount a question for example if the question was asked ambigiously Edited May 15, 2015 by Hassan76 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuki Kuran Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 Paper one was a disaster, but paper 2 was easy;) In paper 1, I think there was a question, were two answers where correct just like the aperture/green light one. It said that a particle with mass m, charge q had radius r in a unuform magnetic field. If another particle entered and had the same radius r, what could be its mass, charge and velocity. I have solved itmv^2/r=qvBmv/r=qBmv/q=BrI think that it had options 2m, 2q, v and 2m, q, v/2No,there is one answer,for this reason mcq is tricky, however after recieving feedback they may accept 2 answers or discount a question for example if the question was asked ambigiouslyDo you think that someone has reported it? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan76 Posted May 15, 2015 Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 Paper one was a disaster, but paper 2 was easy;) In paper 1, I think there was a question, were two answers where correct just like the aperture/green light one. It said that a particle with mass m, charge q had radius r in a unuform magnetic field. If another particle entered and had the same radius r, what could be its mass, charge and velocity. I have solved itmv^2/r=qvBmv/r=qBmv/q=BrI think that it had options 2m, 2q, v and 2m, q, v/2No,there is one answer,for this reason mcq is tricky, however after recieving feedback they may accept 2 answers or discount a question for example if the question was asked ambigiouslyDo you think that someone has reported it?No need to report it, btw I chose the false response and didn't notice there 2 were valid, but the idea is that the velocity selector is explicitly explained in the books. So v is not changed, for this reason what is displayed is m/q ratio Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam1996 Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 What did you get for the impossible electron in a box momentum? I guessed D, the one with 4 in the denominator Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuki Kuran Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) What did you get for the impossible electron in a box momentum? I guessed D, the one with 4 in the denominatorI also chose the one with 4. Don't know why. Edited May 16, 2015 by Yuki Kuran 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassan76 Posted May 16, 2015 Report Share Posted May 16, 2015 I do not remember the possible choices but here is how you do it, p= lambda/ hLambda = 2L/n, n is an integer and cannot be o.5 for example so , h/4l is not possible 1 Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.