Maryam M Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 Okay, so I'm doing my essay on the third prescribed title " Should key events in the historical development of AOK always be judged by the standards of there time?" l was thinking if l can have a claim one AOK and a counterclaim in another AOK? Like I say that it shouldn't be judged in science and should be judged in ethics. In other words, 1 AOK is the claim and the other is the counterclaim. Position undecided? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swedishgäri Posted February 13, 2017 Report Share Posted February 13, 2017 I don't fully understand what you mean. The way I have understood my own TOK question is that you have to judge it in science and social sciences and such Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maryam M Posted February 14, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2017 I'm asking if i can have no position on the topic? In the introduction we are supposed to state our position, can mine be undecided? (Neither standards of our time or their time.) Question 2: Can one of the AOKs be a claim and the other AOK counters it? Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
In terminal ass as mint Posted February 15, 2017 Report Share Posted February 15, 2017 4 hours ago, Maryam M said: I'm asking if i can have no position on the topic? In the introduction we are supposed to state our position, can mine be undecided? (Neither standards of our time or their time.) Question 2: Can one of the AOKs be a claim and the other AOK counters it? The TOK essay in essentially an argument and requires evidence of counter-claims. You don't have to give your own opinion, just the two opposing sides of the discussion. Reply Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.